FIBONACCI RUBRIC |
|||||
Project Grading |
|||||
STUDENT: |
|
DATE: |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
SCORE |
Social Studies NETS/ Big6™
Skills Standards: |
4 Points
|
3 Points Four sources were visited during Fibonacci unit. |
2 Points Three sources were visited during Fibonacci unit.
|
1 Point Two or fewer sources were visited during
Fibonacci unit. |
|
Note Taking |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points Note cards show student
members utilized only three resources, and misinterpreted statements,
graphics and questions and failed to identify relevant arguments. |
1 Points Note cards show student
recorded no information from resources, and ignored alternative points of
view. |
|
Math: |
4
points |
3
points |
2
points |
1
points |
|
Math: Measurement |
4
points |
3
points |
2
points |
1
points |
|
ELA: |
4 Points Names
and sentences, “I”, days of the week and/or places begin with a capital
letter. |
3 Points Sentences
and names consistently begin with a capital letter. |
2 Points Names
or sentences begin with a capital letter.
|
0 Points No
capitals. |
|
ELA: |
4 Points Student
uses periods, !, “”, and/or ? to make writing more descriptive. |
3 Points Student
consistently uses a period. |
2 Points Student
uses a period some of the time. |
0 Points No
punctuation. |
|
ELA: |
4 Points Student
wrote in complete, meaningful sentences where required. The composition has no grammatical errors
or spelling mistakes. |
3 Points Student
wrote in well-formed sentences where required. The composition has few grammar mistakes. |
2 Points Student
uses generally correct complete sentences when required. The composition has some grammar mistakes.
|
1 Points Student
does not use complete sentences when required. The composition has many grammar mistakes. |
|
TECHNOLOGY: |
4 Points Student
responded to more than three students for each Blog topic and posted own
responses timely. |
3 Points Student
responded to three students for each Blog topic and posted own responses
timely. |
2 Points Student
responded to only 1 or 2 students on average for each Blog topic and/or did
not post own responses timely. |
1 Points Student
did not respond to other students for each Blog topic and did not post
responses for all topics and/or did not post own responses timely. |
|
TECHNOLOGY: |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points Occasionally
able to use suggested internet links to find information and navigates within
these sites easily without assistance. |
1 Points |
|
TECHNOLOGY: |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points Occasionally
able to handheld PDA unit to keep notes instead of index cards, but requires
some assistance to |
1 Points |
|
Technology:
|
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points Uses
graphing software to produce graphs that do not accurately visually explain
the data and results of the projects and needed significant assistance. |
1 Points |
|
MUSIC:
|
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
0 Points |
|
MUSIC:
|
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
1 Point |
|
Teamwork |
4 Points The group documents how
members brainstormed, discussed, assumed roles and solved problems. Teacher observation
over the five class period that the project is clearly a group effort. |
3 Points The group documents how
members divided tasks, shared the workload and managed problems in a way that
advanced the group goal. |
2 Points The group occasionally
helped one another but required teacher assistance to resolve differences. One person documents
that he/she did most of the work and/or problems were not managed in a way
that advanced the group goal. |
1 point The group required
teacher assistance with dividing tasks and resolving differences. Few people contributed
their fair share of work. |
|
Total Points |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
/
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL GRADE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEVELS |
SCORE |
|
|
|
|
4 - Exceeds
Standards |
48- 56 |
|
|
|
|
3 - Meets
Standards |
36- 47 |
|
|
|
|
2 -
Partially Meets Standards |
26- 35 |
|
|
|
|
1 -
Minimally Meets Standards |
1 - 25 |
|
|
|
|
RESOURCES:
Rubistar Kathy
Schrock's Guide for Educators - Assessment Rubrics
http://rubistar.4teachers.org http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/assess.html
University of
Wisconsin – Stout
http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/profdev/pptrubric.html
Teach-nology
http://teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/general/